View Article |
Exploring teacher strategies in teaching descriptive writing in Indonesia
Sufatmi Suriyanti1, Aizan Yaacob2.
Purpose – This paper is the outcome of a study which examined
teacher strategies in teaching descriptive writing to junior high
school students in Delitua, North Sumatra, Indonesia. The study was
based on two questions: 1) What are the teaching strategies used by
EFL teachers in teaching descriptive writing? 2) To what extent did
the descriptive writing intervention change the EFL teacher teaching
strategies?
Methodology –The qualitative data were obtained from observations,
interviews and student writing. An intervention conducted with four
teachers for four months using Spencer’s Writing Model (2005) to
enhance the teaching of writing strategies was examined. The data
were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic
coding.
Findings – The findings revealed that the teachers used limited
strategies in teaching writing due to their lack of knowledge and
understanding of the writing approaches. However, after the
writing intervention, they improved their instructional strategies by
incorporating richer writing descriptions which contained sensory
details, figurative language and vivid words.
Significance – These findings can be used as teaching guidelines for
EFL writing in any teacher professional development programmes.
Training of teachers could be a starting point not only to increase
teachers’ knowledge and skills in teaching writing but also to
increase their awareness of the beliefs about teaching and learning. Our study provided evidence that training can bring about changes
in teachers’ pedagogical practices which in turn, will lead to a more
meaningful learning environment for their learners.
Affiliation:
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 302 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
3 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (2) |
Rank |
Q1 (Cultural Studies) Q2 (Education) Q3¬¬¬ (Psychology (all)) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.385) |
|
|
|