View Article |
Writing quality of non-native MA thesis: perceptions and practices of examiners and students
Fatahipour, Majid1, Nemati, Majid2.
Amongst extensive research on thesis writing quality, few provide a detailed
account of common writing challenges/errors as perceived by examiners vs.
students. In this study, eight recent English theses marked-up by examiners
and defended in Iranian universities were selected randomly among those
thesis made available (n=45). Based on an appraisal of comments written
by examiners, a set of common challenges were drawn, which was confirmed
by observations made by the researcher in viva voce sessions and then
inspired questions about thesis writing quality. When administered to twenty
examiners and seventy students, the most recurring themes in their practice
were confirmed. The results draw a more precise picture, than previously
available, of what examiners actually expect of a thesis and found four
major areas of challenges in thesis writing, classified under lack of clarity
in explaining, thesis formatting, grammatical errors and organisational
inconsistencies. Findings also discussed the most significant practices in
writing each chapter and reveal differences in perceptions of students/
examiners.
Affiliation:
- Islamic Azad University, Iran
- Islamic Azad University, Iran
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 291 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
2 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (0.5) |
Rank |
Q4 (Education) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.198) |
|
|
|