View Article |
Compliance level of international education standards (IES) 2 among the professional accountants bodies
Rohana-Norliza Yusof1, Masanita Mat Noh2.
This study has taken one of the benchmarking methodology from Global Accounting Education
2012 study using IESs compliance as a global benchmark for the reason that IESs are widelyaccepted
as benchmarks for accounting education. A content analysis approach was utilized to
conduct this study. It is known as an unobtrusive research method. It has been adopted by various
disciplines such as social sciences, communications, psychology, political science, history, and
language studies. First, the study has identified the documents, texts, and related resources on
IESs compliance by member bodies. Second, the dimensions of the mandatory standards indicated
in bold letters in the IESs are identified to construct data checklist using the pre-determined
categories. The final process is to determine the measurement of the dimensions of the mandatory
standards as represented by the pre-determined categories. Finding of the present study shows that
the incomplete compliance of IES 2 no 3 is not only among the developing countries but also in
developed countries. Further investigation on IES 2 compliance in this study shows that in some
cases, member bodies do provide one or two courses as part of accounting professional education.
Affiliation:
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 146 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
1 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
|
|
|