View Article |
Examining the quality of english test items using psychometric and linguistic characteristics among grade six pupils
Suppiah Shanmugam, S. K1, Vincent,Wong2.
Purpose - This study examined the quality of English test items
using psychometric and linguistic characteristics among Grade Six
pupils.
Method - Contrary to the conventional approach of relying only
on statistics when investigating item quality, this study adopted a
mixed-method approach by employing psychometric analysis and
cognitive interviews. The former was conducted on 30 Grade Six
pupils, with each item representing a different construct commonly
found in English test papers. Qualitative input was obtained
through cognitive interviews with five Grade Six pupils and expert
judgements from three teachers.
Findings - None of the items were found to be too easy or difficult,
and all items had positive discrimination indices. The item on idioms was most ideal in terms of difficulty and discrimination.
Difficult items were found to be vocabulary-based. Surprisingly,
the higher-order-thinking subjective items proved to be excellent
in difficulty, although improvements could be made on their ability
to discriminate. The qualitative expert judgements agreed with the
quantitative psychometric analysis. Certain results from the item
analysis, however, contradicted past findings that items with the
ideal item difficulty value between 0.4 and 0.6 would have equally
ideal item discrimination index.
Significance -The findings of the study can serve as a reminder
on the significance of using Classical Test Theory, a non-complex
psychometric approach in assisting classroom teacher practitioners
during the meticulous process of test design and ensuring test item
quality.
Affiliation:
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, MALAYSIA, Malaysia
- Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 56 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
3 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (2) |
Rank |
Q1 (Cultural Studies) Q2 (Education) Q3¬¬¬ (Psychology (all)) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.385) |
|
|
|