View Article |
Self-directed learning curriculum: students’ perspectives of university learning experiences
Nurfaradilla Mohamad Nasri1, Lilia Halim2, Halim & Mohamad Asyraf Abd Talib3.
Purpose - Self-directed learning (SDL) requires students to
explore and decide their own learning objectives and strategies,
and incorporate the various learning opportunities and resources
throughout their learning process. This study investigates the
university students’ perspectives on university learning experiences
and aims to highlight the extent of the university’s support ecosystem
to determine the effectiveness of SDL implementation.
Methodology - Twenty Malaysian public university students were
interviewed to obtain their views on SDL, and subsequently, their
SDL experiences were further examined. A constructivist grounded
theory approach was employed as the methodological and analytical
framework for this study. A ‘backward-and-forward’ approach was
applied to analyse the interview data.
Findings - The findings suggested that a large number of university
curriculum could potentially inhibit SDL. However, most university
students acknowledged that SDL could support their lifelong learning journey, and prepare them to be skilful workers. Moreover, most
students suggested that the SDL should be implemented as a type of
learning where freedom in learning becomes a priority, rather than
educator-designed learning strategies.
Significance - The mastery of SDL skills is important to ensure
that the students are competent when facing real world challenges.
Hence, this study supports the effective implementation of SDL,
where both students and educators should acknowledge their roles
as equal learning partners
Affiliation:
- Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, Abkhazia
- Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, Abkhazia
- Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, Abkhazia
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 73 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
3 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (2) |
Rank |
Q1 (Cultural Studies) Q2 (Education) Q3¬¬¬ (Psychology (all)) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.385) |
|
|
|