View Article |
MOOC quality design criteria for programming and non-programming students
Aniza Sabjan1, Alawiyah Abd Wahab2, Azizah Ahmad3, Rahayu Ahmad4, Syahida Hassan5, Juliana Wahid6.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality design criteria for developing a Massive
Open Online Course (MOOC). Currently, there are limited studies that highlight the required design
criteria for the MOOC programming courses. A descriptive analysis was conducted to examine the
characteristics of the three important quality design criteria which are (i) Instructional Design Criteria
involving Lecture Organization and Culture; (ii) Technical Criteria involving User Interface, Video
Content, Learning and Social Tools, and Learning Analytics; and (iii) E-Assessment. The data were
collected from 306 respondents, representing the UUM MOOC students of 2018 class, were further
analyzed using the T-Test hypothesis testing to determine whether both the programming and nonprogramming students require the same quality design criteria. The questionnaire used in this study
consists of 46 items related to the MOOC quality design criteria that were adapted from previous
studies. The results indicate that out of the nine constructs, four have obtained significant differences
in the mean scores, namely the Video Content, Instructional Design, Culture, and E-assessment. This
signifies that different quality design criteria are needed for both the programming and nonprogramming students. The outcome of this study may assist the developers in designing the MOOC
by providing the required criteria according to its importance.
Affiliation:
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia, Malaysia
Toggle translation
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 73 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
2 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (0.5) |
Rank |
Q4 (Education) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.198) |
|
|
|