View Article |
Qualitative study of SOCA (Student oral case analysis) as assessment instruments in dental students
Nyka Dwi Febria1, Yomanda Dea Damara2.
Introduction: Education and learning are two terms that have different contexts in the same scope. Each learning method that has been implemented requires an evaluation that is used as a benchmark for the success of a learning method. Aligning the tutorial with PBL (Problem Based Learning) and CBL (Case Based Learning) methods is evalu- ated in the form of SOCA (Student Oral Case Analysis). SOCA is one of the oral exams that began to be applied to students in the 2017 class year at the Dental Study Program at the University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. The aim of this study was to determine the implementation of SOCA, the benefits of SOCA and the perceived impact of SOCA. Method: This research is a qualitative study using the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) method. Data collection in this study was carried out through online interviews with six informants. The informants in this study were selected through a purposive sampling technique. Results: This study to indicate that the examiner has an effect on the objectivity of the assessment, the SOCA exam scenario is good and easy to understand, some informants say the time provided is still lacking. SOCA implementation refers to scenario PBL (Problem Base Learning) and CBL (Case Base Learning). This scenario was discussed in tutorial learning. So that is easier for student to get passed in SOCA exam. The benefits of SOCA include increasing the ability to analyze cases, SOCA can be used as learning evaluation materials, and stimulate active learning. Conclusion: SOCA has positive and negative impacts. The nega- tive impact felt, among others, causes fear and focus on other lessons is reduced.
Affiliation:
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
3 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (0.2) |
Rank |
Q4 (Medicine (all)) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.144) |
|
|
|