View Article |
The concept of gender and its acceptability as a category of analysis in economics: an Islamic perspective
Syed Redzuan Alsagoff1, Asan Ali Golam Hassan2, Wan Suhaimi Wan Abdullah3.
Changes in the understanding of gender are making it
complicated to use gender as a category of analysis.
Previously, it was generally accepted that gender is a
binary category, comprising of male and female,
based on clear biological distinction. Then came the
idea that gender is a sociocultural construct. More
recently, gender is said to be based on each person’s
personal conception of himself or herself. These
novel ideas have detached the meaning of gender
from its biological foundation and have consequently
made the concept of gender ambiguous and
subjective, with theoretically infinite possible
interpretations that can formulate an indeterminate
number of genders. Such arbitrariness is unsuitable
for scientific analysis. Accordingly, mainstream
economists, in their aspiration to be scientific, have
largely ignored these semantic developments and
have continued to use the biologically defined binary
categorisation of gender, presumably because of its
practicality when used in economic analysis. From an Islamic perspective, economists are right to use such
definition of gender, not because it is practical to do
so, but because it conforms to reality and truth (ḥaqq)
as revealed by religion. This article discusses these
ideas as well as their history and interactions to show
that from an Islamic perspective the number of
genders is not indeterminate, nor is gender only
practically binary, but it is really and truly binary in
line with the worldview of Islam
Affiliation:
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
Toggle translation
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 33 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
2 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (0.1) |
Rank |
Q3 (Religious Studies) Q3 (Philosophy) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.154) |
|
|
|