View Article |
Study on the performance of two topology multilevel inverter
Nazar, N.S.M1, Thanakodi, S2, Hidzir, H.D.M3, Mat, M.S4, Othman, N.A5.
It has been accepted that conventional inverters have limitation dealing with high voltage
and high power applications. Lately, multilevel inverters are popular for high power
applications due to its improved harmonic profile and increased power ratings. There are
various literatures regarding topology and control techniques of multilevel inverters. This
paper presents the performance of two Flying Capacitor Multilevel Inverter (FCMI)
topologies particularly a 3-level and 5-level multilevel inverters. Besides that, concept of the
topologies and its modulation techniques were described. Sinusoidal pulse width
modulation (SPWM) techniques were utilized in this paper as the topologies control
strategy. Two control parameters, namely the amplitude modulation index, ma and the
frequency modulation index, mfwere varied in order to control the output voltage of the
inverters. The model and simulation study were carried out using Matlab/Simulink software.
Analyses on the performance of the two topologies were based on the fundamental
voltage, output voltage waveform, output harmonic spectrum and total harmonic
distortion (THD). It’s found that the five level FCMI have shown better performance in terms
of THD compared to the three level FCMI in all conditions of varied ma and mf. Based on
the study also, five level FCMI shows a better voltage output waveform; close to a sinusoidal
waveform compared to the three level FCMI.
Affiliation:
- Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 134 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
6 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (1.4) |
Rank |
Q3 (Engineering (all)) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.191) |
|
|
|