View Article |
The high performance linpack (HPL) benchmark evaluation on UTP high performance cluster computing
Wong, Chun Shiang1, Izzatdin Abdul Aziz2, Nazleeni Samiha Haron3, Jafreezal Jaafar4, Norzatul Natrah Ismail5, Mazlina Mehat6.
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) has formed a high performance computing cluster
(HPCC) inside the campus by utilizing most of the campus’ existing resources as the
computing resources. All the resources are interconnected within a same network, enabling
it to be accessed by users anywhere anytime within and outside the campus. The UTP HPCC
is used by researchers, including lecturers and students from UTP also from external parties to
compute intensive applications. However, the UTP HPCC has never been benchmarked
before, hence the performance and the ability of UTP HPCC are still unverified. The
benchmarking is imperative in order to measure the true performance and the ability of UTP
HPCC. This paper aims to evaluate the performance of UTP HPCC using a suitable
benchmarking tool as well as to determine the optimal parameters configuration of the
selected benchmarking tool. A comparative study has been done in order to select the best
benchmarking tool between High performance LINPACK (HPL) and the NAS Parallel. The
results show that HPL is a more suitable benchmarking tool for UTP HPCC compared to NAS
Parallel. A series of experiments were carried out to select the optimum parameter of HPL
configuration for UTP HPCC. The results from benchmarking show that the peak
performance is achievable under the test conditions.
Affiliation:
- Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 175 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
6 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (1.4) |
Rank |
Q3 (Engineering (all)) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.191) |
|
|
|