Articles uploaded in MyJurnal |
|
|
View Article |
Objective measurement for surgical skill evaluation
Siti Nor Zawani Ahmmad1, Eileen, Su Lee Ming2, Yeong, Che Fai3, Suneet Sood4, Anil Gandhi5.
The purpose of this study was to identify measurable parameters that can be used to
quantitatively assess psychomotor skills, specifically for surgical skills assessment. Sixteen
participants were recruited from two groups: surgeon (N = 5) and non-surgeon (N = 11).
Both groups underwent a psychomotor test using a custom developed ‘Green Target’
module which was designed using a virtual reality system. Six parameters were used to
compare the psychomotor skills between the two groups. The results showed that surgeons
outperformed the non-surgeons in five out of six parameters investigated and the
difference was statistically significant. The average normalised comparison values for
surgeons and non-surgeons for motion path accuracy, motion path precision, economy of
movement, end-point accuracy and end-point precision were 0.13+0.12 and 0.17+0.12,
0.08+0.11 and 0.10+0.10, 3.76+1.76 and 4.08+2.24, 0.12+0.10 and 0.17+0.11, 0.04+0.10 and
0.07+0.10 respectively, p < 0.05). These parameters can potentially be used to objectively
assess the performance of surgical skill.
Affiliation:
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
- Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
- Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia
- Monash University Malaysia, Malaysia
Toggle translation
Download this article (This article has been downloaded 139 time(s))
|
|
Indexation |
Indexed by |
MyJurnal (2021) |
H-Index
|
6 |
Immediacy Index
|
0.000 |
Rank |
0 |
Indexed by |
Scopus 2020 |
Impact Factor
|
CiteScore (1.4) |
Rank |
Q3 (Engineering (all)) |
Additional Information |
SJR (0.191) |
|
|
|
|
|